🚗🌍 ✨ The final score brings everything together. It combines the strength of non-car transport, the value of hiring a car, and the broader travel environment to produce a simple, practical recommendation for travellers. Although many destinations fall somewhere in the middle, this scoring system therefore helps make sense of the differences in a clear, consistent, and ultimately more useful way.
🚕 1. Taxis — Context Only (Not Scored)
Taxis sit in a unique space: they are neither part of public transport nor part of the car-rental experience. They’re a blend of the two, and therefore they do not count directly towards any numeric score. However, they still provide useful context about how people actually move around.
We include them only to give context because:
-
🚖 Heavy taxi use usually signals car-dependency
-
🟠 If people rely on taxis because rental cars are restricted or expensive, that’s an important clue
-
🟢 Destinations with excellent public transport shouldn’t require taxis at all
So taxis help paint the picture; however, they still don’t influence the numbers.
🔁 2. “Do You Need a Car?” — The Inverse of All the Non-Car Options 🚇🚌🚶♂️🚴♀️⛴️
This score flips the public-transport and active-travel ratings on their head, and consequently gives a clear sense of how essential a car truly is.
-
🚉 Strong non-car options → low car-need score
-
🏜️ Weak non-car options → high car-need score
It reflects how essential a car truly is, especially when distances are large or infrastructure is limited.
Examples:
-
🟦 Hong Kong, Japan, Switzerland → extremely low need
Altogether, it’s a simple measure of independence without a car.
🔧 3. “Is It Worth Hiring a Car?” — The Sum of Car-Related Factors 🛣️⛽🅿️✨
This score comes directly from the earlier car-rental categories, and furthermore reflects how enjoyable, affordable, and practical driving will be.
- 🚗 Availability & cost
- ⛽ Fuel prices & tolls
- 🛣️ Road quality & congestion
- 🚨 Road safety
- 🅿️ Ease and cost of parking
Together these show whether hiring a car is good value and easy to use; moreover, they highlight differences between countries where driving is simply a pleasure and those where it is more of a challenge.
- 🟢 High score → renting a car is genuinely worthwhile
- 🟡 Medium score → helpful in many areas, optional in others
- 🔴 Low score → poor value or difficult to use
👨✈️ 4. “Best With Driver?” — Simple Yes/No Indicator 🚘🧭
Some destinations are best navigated with a car + driver, especially where:
- 🏜️ terrain is difficult
- 🚫 self-drive isn’t allowed
- 🛑 road safety is low
- 🔀 navigation requires local knowledge
This appears as:
- 🟢 Yes → driver recommended
- 🔴 No → driver not needed
Consequently, this doesn’t change any score — it’s simply guidance for travellers.
↔️ 5. Left or Right Side of the Road 🚦
Every country is marked as driving on the:
- L = left
- R = right
This is a requirement, not a scoring factor.
Car rental companies do not care which side visitors drive on in their home country. Instead, they look at considerations such as:
- 🎂 driver age
- 🪪 licence validity
- 📅 how long the licence has been held
- ⚠️ penalty points or endorsements
- 🛡️ insurance eligibility
Therefore the L/R indicator is included solely for convenience.
🧭✨ 6. Final Recommendation: “Should You Rent a Car?”
Finally, we combine:
- the need score
- the value score
- and the contextual indicators
…to give a clear, neutral recommendation.
Some destinations are very strong “yes” choices because a car genuinely enhances the trip:
- 🇨🇦 Canada → long distances + excellent driving environment
- 🇭🇷 Croatia → great roads + superb scenery
- 🇳🇦 Namibia → essential for independent travel
Meanwhile, places with outstanding public transport generally become a “no” regardless of how easy driving may be. Likewise, countries that fall between these extremes benefit most from an objective scoring system, because it helps travellers reach a balanced decision.